I have never lost a family member to war.
Both grandfathers (Dutch Freise and Bill Wright) were veterans of World War II. My dad's oldest brother, my Uncle Terry, served in Vietnam. My dad was in the Army as Vietnam drew to a close, but he was never sent overseas.
Going back further on my family tree, two great-grandfathers on my mother's side (George Feurer and William W. Freise) served in World War I. William was severely injured by mustard gas in France.
I have a great-great grandfather (William S. Sunderland) and two third great-grandfathers (George W. Wright and Milton B. Slaughter) on my dad's side who served the Union Army in the Civil War. George's older brother Enos was disabled in the Vicksburg campaign of 1863 and discharged from his infantry unit.
Also on my dad's side, my fifth great-grandfather fought in the War of 1812 (Ezekiel Emerson), and at least three sixth great-grandfathers (John Emerson, David Burlingame, and Eleazer Ballou) fought for the Patriot cause in the Revolutionary War. Another sixth great-grandfather, James Sinclair, was a Quaker opposed to participating in war, but he is recognized by the Daughters of the American Revolution as a Patriot because he offered cider and supplies to the revolutionaries.
These are just veterans I know about. I recently uncovered some evidence that a second great-grand uncle of mine (a brother of my great-great grandmother Laura S. Williams) may have died in the Spanish American War. An old picture making that assertion is the only purported proof I have of John Stanton Williams' service, so that claim remains unverified so far.
If Memorial Day is meant to commemorate those killed in the course of military service for the United States, then my thoughts and prayers for those veterans is of a general nature. But from a broader perspective, when I consider ordinary folks who answered the call to serve at times of crisis, I can fix my thoughts on my ancestors and relatives who put their lives on the line to defend the American ideal.
This nation is highly imperfect. And how could it be otherwise in this period in human history? But the idea of America has always been worth defending. I am proud that so many people I descend from felt the same way.
Happy Memorial Day to everyone.
If the rain ever lets up in Dallas-Fort Worth, I will celebrate the long weekend with a round or two of golf and perhaps a barbecue. But whatever I do, I will take a moment to pray. I will pray for all the families who have been affected by military conflict, for those veterans who gave up their lives in the line of duty, and for those ancestors of mine who willingly served in the military in times of crisis and conflict.
(Photo Below: A newspaper story about my Grandpa Bill getting his Navy "wings")
Blog Postings by Mark Wright from his home in Everybody's Damn Suburb, Arlington, Texas
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Going to Augusta
Going to Augusta
By Mark Wright
I
have never been to the Master’s. The venerable golf tournament, arguably the
most significant on the Professional Golf Association Tour, is what the Georgia
city of Augusta is most known for.
I
have taken part in a less heralded occurrence in that city. I was born in
Augusta on December 3, 1979 to a nurse mother and an Army doctor father from
Texas. I was only there for about a year before my family returned to Texas. I
was only around those parts for one Master’s. Sadly, I did not witness Seve
Ballesteros’ first green jacket, in April 1980. Although, given that I was four
months old at the time, I could have been at the bottom of a dusty red crater
on Mars for all I know. I, of course, remember nothing of those sleeping, crying,
self-wetting early days.
George
W. Wright was also not in town for golf. Long before there was a Master’s, George
was in Augusta for about a month in the spring and early summer of 1865. My
third great-grandfather was there to occupy a Confederate arsenal in the months
following Gen. Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox and President Lincoln’s
assassination. In late June, George and his fellow members of the 28th
Iowa Infantry Regiment moved on to Savannah, Georgia, where they were mustered
out of the Union Army at the end of July after nearly three years’ volunteer
service[1].
George,
born in Ohio to a westward-moving pioneer mother and father, enlisted as a
private in August 1862 at the listed age of 26 – I believe he may actually have
been 25, four days after older brother Enos signed up[2].
Their regiment served with distinction, especially during the pivotal Vicksburg
campaign in the spring of 1863. Enos D. Wright, two years George’s senior,
would be discharged due to disability at the end of the Vicksburg campaign[3].
The campaign was a rousing success for the North. The Federals forced the
Confederates inside the walls of Vicksburg in a decisively disadvantaged
position and helped Gen. Ulysses S. Grant boost a sagging reputation[4].
Grant
would go on to become the scandal-marred 18th president of the
United States. George, meanwhile, would serve out the duration of the war,
including that brief assignment in Augusta, and return home in August 1865 to
the humble farmlands of Benton County, Iowa, where his wife, Sarah E. Curl
Wright, an Indiana-born descendant of Scots-Irish Quakers, and their three
children beckoned. A year later, in July 1866, my second Great-Grandfather
Harrison “Harry” Henry Wright was born.
Somewhere
along the way, the story of my third great-grandfather, a man who supplied me
with my surname and my Y DNA, was forgotten to Wright family lore. My dad had
never heard the name George W. Wright. I discovered George and many other
ancestors and relatives when I began undertaking a study of the history of my
father’s side of the family in early 2014. Even now, after many hours of
research, I know precious little about George W. Wright, except what the documents
reveal. I have seen his pension file[5]
and the record of his headstone at the cemetery of the Veterans Home in
Marshalltown, Iowa.[6]
But many mysteries remain about this veteran of the Battle of Champion’s Hill,
this brief visitor to Augusta.
I
wonder why he died in his early fifties. I wonder how he felt about his service
in the Union Army and what led him and Enos to enlist rather than wait for the
eventual advent of a draft. Hardly a military lifer, George, like many of his
contemporaries, was, at his core, a simple farmer. But for a little while, in
his country’s time of need, he was a foot soldier.
Gen.
Alvin P. Hovey offered this lofty assessment of Wright’s 28th
Infantry Regiment in a May 23, 1863 report on the Battle of Champion’s Hill:
“Of the Twenty-ninth Wisconsin, Twenty-fourth and Twenty-eighth Iowa, in what words
of praise shall I speak? Not more than six months in the service, their record
will compare with the oldest and best tried regiments in the field.”[7]
Generally,
I am loathe to cast mortal men and women into the role of hero, nor do I assume
that war a person's service, however honorable, is done purely out of virtue. But I find a lot of valor in
Pvt. George W. Wright’s war record. I do think he was a hero in his own small way.
He certainly risked his life and endured many hardships. I wish I could shake
his hand and thank him or at least see a picture of the man who gave me my family
name. It is just too bad I got to Augusta some 114 years too late.
[1] Logan,
Guy E. Roster and Record of Iowa Soldiers
in the War of the Rebellion, Together With Historical Sketches of Volunteer
Organizations, 1861-1866, Vol. 3, 17th-31st Regiments – Infantry, pp.1240-1241.
Des Moines: Emory H. English, state printer, 1910.
[2]
Ibid, p. 1334.
[3]
Ibid, p. 1334.
[4] Civil
War Trust. Champion Hill – Champion’s
Hill, Bakers Creek – Hinds County, Mississippi, May 16, 1863. http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/champion-hill.html?tab=facts.
Accessed 14 April 2015.
[5] Fold3.
Civil War and Later Veterans Pension
Index - Wright, George W. http://www.fold3.com/image/2095864/.
Accessed 14 April 2015.
[6] Ancestry.com.
Headstones Provided for Deceased Union Civil
War Veterans, 1879-1903 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007. Original data: Card Records of Headstones
Provided for Deceased Union Civil War Veterans, ca. 1879-ca. 1903; (National
Archives Microfilm Publication M1845, 22 rolls); Records of the Office of the
Quartermaster General, Record Group 92; National Archives, Washington, D.C.
[7] Reports
of Brig. Gen. Alvin P. Hovey, U.S. Army, commanding Twelfth Division, including
operations May 2-20. MAY 16, 1863, Battle
of Champion's Hill, or Baker's Creek, Miss. O.R.-- SERIES I--VOLUME XXIV/2
[S# 37]. http://www.civilwarhome.com/hoveychampionhillor.html. Accessed 14
April 2015
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Who Am I? - What Three Different Genetic Genealogy Sites Say About My Ethnic/National Origins
Growing up, if anyone asked where my ancestors came from, I had a quick answer: English/Irish on my dad's side. German on my mom's side.
In the last year, a thorough study of my genealogy (with more success finding information on my dad's side) has taught me that the answer to where you come from is a bit more complicated than naming off two ethnic groups. For one, ancestors on my dad's side have been in America much longer than I would've ever expected. Some were very early 17th century colonists in places like Massachusetts and Virginia. So I feel much more American after doing my genealogical study. But I have also found English, Scottish, Irish, German and Prussian origins for immigrant ancestors, so genealogy does engender some stronger bonds to the "Old Country," as well.
The paper trail is amazing. But each line I trace hits a dead end somewhere along the trail backward through time. To dig deeper into my ancestral roots, I tried to determine the answer to this question: "What does my DNA say about my origins?"
Autosomal DNA testing services provide users with DNA-based national/ethnic origins that suggest where my ancestors were living some 500 years ago -- before the era of European exploration of the New World. And consequently, the three services I have used have a high amount of agreement about my results and there really weren't many surprises. English and German was a bit of an oversimplification on my younger self's part, but there was a lot of truth to it, given that there's a strong predominance of Northern and Western European DNA roots. About the only surprise was the relatively high level of Scandinavian DNA. If I am part Norse, I never knew it. The paper trail certainly has offered no clues in this regard. Or has it?
Because many of my ancestors on my dad's side hail from northern and eastern parts of England, I can safely presume that the Danelaw, a region of Viking settlement and rule prior to the Norman Conquest of 1066, had an influence on my ancestry. And my Y-DNA haplogroup, as tested by 23 And Me, is I1, which suggests my paternal ancestry might harken back to roots in Scandinavia or the Jutland Peninsula. In other words, my dad's dad's dad's and so on line could well have originated with Vikings, or possibly Anglo Saxons. But the point is, the apparent Norse aspect of my ancestry, while surprising, actually neatly fits within my British origin story.
Posted below are my results. Rather than pick apart the small differences, the significant takeaway comes from the broader picture that emerges when comparing the three: Heavily Western and Northern European ancestry with strong hints of British (with some Irish), German and Scandinavian origins. And then a small percentage of Southern and Eastern European origins and maybe just a trace of the Asian Caucasus Mountains.
No Native American, African or Middle Eastern/Semitic origins are indicated. I would have welcomed such a surprise. At any rate, my ethnicity does not define who I am, really. It's how I choose to act that should define me. But it does hint at the deep origins of my ancestors. So it begins to tell the story of how I got here.
Family Tree DNA
European 99%:
Western and Central Europe 68%
Scandinavia 29%
Eastern Europe 2%
23 And Me (Speculative View)
European 100%:
Northern European:
British/Irish 31.1%
French & German 19%
Scandinavian 3.9%
Finnish 0.1%
Broadly Northern European 37.9%
Eastern European 2%
Southern European:
Broadly Southern European 1.2%
Broadly European 4.8%
Ancestry DNA
Europe 98%:
Great Britain 32%
Europe West 31%
Scandinavia 14%
Ireland 8%
Europe East 5%
Iberian Peninsula 5%
Italy/Greece 3%
West Asia 2%:
Caucasus 2%
In the last year, a thorough study of my genealogy (with more success finding information on my dad's side) has taught me that the answer to where you come from is a bit more complicated than naming off two ethnic groups. For one, ancestors on my dad's side have been in America much longer than I would've ever expected. Some were very early 17th century colonists in places like Massachusetts and Virginia. So I feel much more American after doing my genealogical study. But I have also found English, Scottish, Irish, German and Prussian origins for immigrant ancestors, so genealogy does engender some stronger bonds to the "Old Country," as well.
The paper trail is amazing. But each line I trace hits a dead end somewhere along the trail backward through time. To dig deeper into my ancestral roots, I tried to determine the answer to this question: "What does my DNA say about my origins?"
Autosomal DNA testing services provide users with DNA-based national/ethnic origins that suggest where my ancestors were living some 500 years ago -- before the era of European exploration of the New World. And consequently, the three services I have used have a high amount of agreement about my results and there really weren't many surprises. English and German was a bit of an oversimplification on my younger self's part, but there was a lot of truth to it, given that there's a strong predominance of Northern and Western European DNA roots. About the only surprise was the relatively high level of Scandinavian DNA. If I am part Norse, I never knew it. The paper trail certainly has offered no clues in this regard. Or has it?
Because many of my ancestors on my dad's side hail from northern and eastern parts of England, I can safely presume that the Danelaw, a region of Viking settlement and rule prior to the Norman Conquest of 1066, had an influence on my ancestry. And my Y-DNA haplogroup, as tested by 23 And Me, is I1, which suggests my paternal ancestry might harken back to roots in Scandinavia or the Jutland Peninsula. In other words, my dad's dad's dad's and so on line could well have originated with Vikings, or possibly Anglo Saxons. But the point is, the apparent Norse aspect of my ancestry, while surprising, actually neatly fits within my British origin story.
Posted below are my results. Rather than pick apart the small differences, the significant takeaway comes from the broader picture that emerges when comparing the three: Heavily Western and Northern European ancestry with strong hints of British (with some Irish), German and Scandinavian origins. And then a small percentage of Southern and Eastern European origins and maybe just a trace of the Asian Caucasus Mountains.
No Native American, African or Middle Eastern/Semitic origins are indicated. I would have welcomed such a surprise. At any rate, my ethnicity does not define who I am, really. It's how I choose to act that should define me. But it does hint at the deep origins of my ancestors. So it begins to tell the story of how I got here.
Family Tree DNA
European 99%:
Western and Central Europe 68%
Scandinavia 29%
Eastern Europe 2%
23 And Me (Speculative View)
European 100%:
Northern European:
British/Irish 31.1%
French & German 19%
Scandinavian 3.9%
Finnish 0.1%
Broadly Northern European 37.9%
Eastern European 2%
Southern European:
Broadly Southern European 1.2%
Broadly European 4.8%
Ancestry DNA
Europe 98%:
Great Britain 32%
Europe West 31%
Scandinavia 14%
Ireland 8%
Europe East 5%
Iberian Peninsula 5%
Italy/Greece 3%
West Asia 2%:
Caucasus 2%
Sunday, September 14, 2014
The Family Witch: An Essay
The Family Witch
By Mark Wright
My family has a dark side. It’s a sordid tale of
witchcraft and devil worship. … And it’s available on Blu-Ray, DVD, and video
on-demand. Whether the tale is true depends on who’s telling it – Hollywood or
historians. Either way, it makes for one hell of an interesting family tree.
I am a Georgian by birth, but I’ve spent my formative
years in Texas. Yet, there’s something Northern in my blood. My paternal
grandmother, who was raised in Missouri (pronounced Missouruh), had deep New
England roots on her mother’s side. One of those Yankee families from which I
descend is named the Shermans. In 1844, Rhode Island denizen Bathsheba Thayer
married into said Sherman family. Bathsheba was the wife of Judson Sherman and
daughter-in-law of my fifth great grandparents Asahel Sherman (who died in
1830) and Rowena Ballou Sherman (who lived until 1859). My fourth great
grandfather Dutee Sherman (born in 1790) was Judson’s older brother and
Bathsheba’s brother-in-law.
Horror movie enthusiasts know Bathsheba Thayer Sherman
for a different reason than marrying into the Sherman family. In the 2013 film The Conjuring, Bathsheba is portrayed as
a malevolent spirit haunting a young couple and their daughters in the early
1970s in rural Burrillville, Rhode Island. Ah yes, my fourth great grand
uncle’s wife was a witch who came back from beyond the grave to haunt a family.
Betty Mencucci, president of the Burrillville Historical& Preservation Society, assures me that genealogists have found no evidence
to support claims that Bathsheba Thayer Sherman was accused of killing a child
or practicing witchcraft or worshiping the devil, contrary to what the film
suggests. Furthermore, records indicate that she died, not from a suicide
brought on by madness, but rather from complications from a stroke.
"As a historical society we researched all the claims made against Bathsheba and it is all nonsense," Mencucci said.
Bathsheba, who was born in 1812, is recorded as a housewife of Burrillville, Rhode Island, in the 1880 U.S. Census. She died about 1885 and was buried on a quiet burial plot with a nice marble headstone. No one in the community, then, seems to have feared that this old woman would return from beyond the grave as a wicked ghost. But in the Internet age, a significant segment of the population, mainly horror-movie fanatics and gullible teens, will forever regard Bathsheba Thayer Sherman as an evil witch who returned from the dead to terrorize an innocent family. The film The Conjuring was based on a book series by Andrea Perron called House of Darkness: House of Light. The author was one of the children living in the reportedly haunted farm house. The book series is positioned as a work of non-fiction, but Perron's claims about Bathsheba have no merit, based on records that exist from Bathsheba’s lifetime. Plus, one should probably always question any claims of paranormal activity in an old house. Dark, creaky buildings get the imagination bubbling over. But no objective evidence ever seems to emerge from those who report the haunting. Instead, ghost stories rely on the willingness of the audience to accept these wild tales on faith, an odd little phenomenon given the general skepticism of the current day.
"As a historical society we researched all the claims made against Bathsheba and it is all nonsense," Mencucci said.
Bathsheba, who was born in 1812, is recorded as a housewife of Burrillville, Rhode Island, in the 1880 U.S. Census. She died about 1885 and was buried on a quiet burial plot with a nice marble headstone. No one in the community, then, seems to have feared that this old woman would return from beyond the grave as a wicked ghost. But in the Internet age, a significant segment of the population, mainly horror-movie fanatics and gullible teens, will forever regard Bathsheba Thayer Sherman as an evil witch who returned from the dead to terrorize an innocent family. The film The Conjuring was based on a book series by Andrea Perron called House of Darkness: House of Light. The author was one of the children living in the reportedly haunted farm house. The book series is positioned as a work of non-fiction, but Perron's claims about Bathsheba have no merit, based on records that exist from Bathsheba’s lifetime. Plus, one should probably always question any claims of paranormal activity in an old house. Dark, creaky buildings get the imagination bubbling over. But no objective evidence ever seems to emerge from those who report the haunting. Instead, ghost stories rely on the willingness of the audience to accept these wild tales on faith, an odd little phenomenon given the general skepticism of the current day.
Whether she's a witch is no real concern to me. But Bathsheba is buried in the same graveyard as my fifth great grandparents. Because her tombstone attracts movie buffs and
cannabis-inhaling college kids, I am concerned for the ongoing preservation of
the Shermans’ graves. Incidents of vandalism have already occurred, and a local law enforcement official damaged Asahel's gravestone during a botched repair job. I am also concerned for the family’s reputation. The
Shermans were a prominent farming family with ties to the founding of Rhode
Island. And these Shermans are related to other famous Shermans, namely, Civil
War Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman and Constitution signer the Honorable Roger
Sherman. I hope mostly people simply view those buried alongside Bathsheba as God-fearing
early residents of the bucolic Blackstone River Valley of Rhode Island and
southern Massachusetts and not as the family of a witch.
Regardless of what folks think of the Sherman family, I remain
proud of my New England ancestors. My direct Sherman ancestors achieved less
fame than our distant cousins William Tecumseh and Roger, but the Rhode Island
Shermans nonetheless played a pivotal role in the early history of this nation.
Rowena Ballou Sherman’s father, Pvt. Eleazer Ballou, fought in the
Revolutionary War. Rowena and Asahel’s daughter-in-law Nancy Emerson Sherman,
my fourth great grandmother, was the granddaughter of two Revolutionary War
Patriots, Capt. John Emerson of the 3rd Worcester County regiment of
the Massachusetts Militia and Capt. David Burlingame of the Rhode Island
Militia. In fact, Pvt. Ballou served in a horse troop under command of Capt.
Burlingame. Nancy’s father, Ezekiel Emerson, is recognized by the Daughters of
1812 as a veteran of the War of 1812, the conflict in which this fledgling
nation repelled British attempts to forcefully retake its former American
colonies.
The Daughters of the American Revolution documentation for my paternal grandmother, Frances Ann Sunderland Wright (AKA Grandma Sundie) authenticates Capt. John
Emerson as her fourth great grandfather and certifies that he served in the
Revolution. The same record shows her great-great grandparents are Dutee
Sherman and Nancy Emerson Sherman. Therefore, my grandmother could have also
claimed Eleazer Ballou and David Burlingame as Patriot direct ancestors on her
application.
The Shermans also provide me with a direct link to the
Pilgrims. Robert Hicks, my tenth great grandfather, brought his family to the
Plymouth Colony a year after the arrival of the Mayflower. His granddaughter
Dorcas Hicks married Edmund Sherman, and they are, respectively, my eighth
great grandmother and grandfather.
Edmund’s father, my ninth great grandfather Philip Sherman, made quite a name for himself in the early days of New England.
Philip, who was born around 1610 in southeastern England and migrated to
Massachusetts Bay in his early 20s, had the fortitude and convictions to
question the rigid Puritan doctrine. He was banished from the colony for his
beliefs during the Antinomian Controversy but found his way to what became
Rhode Island, where he was one of the purchasers of Aquidneck Island. He served
as the colony’s first secretary and later as the town clerk of Portsmouth.
Presidents George Herbert Walker Bush and George W. Bush and famed British
Prime Minister Winston Churchill are my distant cousins through our shared
ancestor from the 17th century, the aforementioned Philip Sherman.
My brother and my dad find it hard to believe we are
scions of these old New England families. "How could we be related to presidents?" my brother said, underscoring our status as average Joes from Texas (kind of like the Bushes often claim to be). But, indeed, my paternal grandmother
was the great granddaughter of Ora Sherman Sinclair, the daughter of the
aforementioned Nancy and Dutee Sherman. The only family lore I heard during my
childhood was that we were related to Roger Sherman, who signed the Declaration
of Independence. And he is a relative, but it’s a far more distant relationship than my
grandmother’s stories implied. Indeed, several of my aunts are reticent to
accept my genealogical findings because I found old Rog to be a fourth cousin
seven times removed – hardly the close relative the family imagined him to
be. Still, we Wrights inherit quite a colorful and illustrious history through
our direct ancestors: the Rhode Island Shermans and related families. For
instance, a ninth great grandfather Joseph Emerson was a Puritan minister who
links us to distant relative Ralph Waldo Emerson.
My New England ancestors established themselves as early
landowners and prominent citizens in the American colonies and played an active
role in the struggle for independence from Britain. And if you ever visit a
bookstore or rent a film on demand, you might see something about a witch who
married into my family. And if you believe my family had a witch in it, maybe
there is a pair of ruby slippers I can sell you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
